|
||||
|
||||
Rhetorical Tools for Communicating Strategic Change: Dana's Definitional StatementPriscilla RogersStephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan Manique GunesekeraNanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School Mei Ling YangNanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School April 2007 Ross School of Business Paper No. 1079 Abstract: What rhetorical tools are critical for managers seeking to communicate strategy? What textual features matter when developing a language of change? To explore these questions we compare Dana Corporation's 1987 strategic definitional statement, The Philosophy and Policies of Dana, with its 2004 revision, our framework being Eccles and Nohria's triadic of rhetoric, action, and identity. In a newly competitive environment, Dana evolved from recognition as an exemplary company into reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Concurrently, their 2004 statement marks a significant rhetorical shift. Dana's example suggests the usefulness of thematic rearrangement, language adjustments, and opening sentence subjects to articulate revisions in purpose, values, and behavioral expectations and illustrates the usefulness of Eccles and Nohria's framework for understanding rhetoric as a strategic organizational activity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 Keywords: strategic change, organizational rhetoric, corporate mission JEL Classification: L21, M14 working papers seriesDate posted: June 10, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds