Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=987143
 
 

Footnotes (133)



 


 



Sustainability, Regulatory Dilemmas and GMOs: The US and the EU Compared


Rosemary Lyster


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law


Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 111-139, 2004
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 07/32

Abstract:     
Agency decision-making regarding the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment, which has the potential to affect the environment and human health, must be consistent with the principles of sustainable development. This requires adherence to the principles of intergenerational equity, the conservation of biological diversity, the precautionary principle, and the polluter pays principle. The potential risks associated with GMOs make public participation an essential element of agency decision-making. This is because the scientific evidence about the safety, or otherwise, of GMOs is sufficiently uncertain. In such a case, decisions to release them must be politically negotiated. Yet when the regulatory arrangements for dealing with GMOs in the United States and the European Union are compared and contrasted markedly different regulatory frameworks emerge. In the case of the US, the regulation of GMOs falls short of the sustainability benchmark, while the EU's seems entirely consistent with it. How do we explain, then, the paradox of a US public which is so accepting of food derived under a relatively lax regulatory and administrative framework, and a fearful EU public protected by extensive regulation and risk assessment processes?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Genetically modified organisms, sustainable development, regulatory frameworks

JEL Classification: K32, K10, O13, O32, I18

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 18, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Lyster, Rosemary, Sustainability, Regulatory Dilemmas and GMOs: The US and the EU Compared. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 111-139, 2004; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 07/32. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=987143

Contact Information

Rosemary Lyster (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 934
Downloads: 184
Download Rank: 95,463
Footnotes:  133
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.656 seconds