Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (72)



 


 



Twelve Angry Men: A Jury Between Fact and Norm


Robert P. Burns


Northwestern University - School of Law


Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2007
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-15

Abstract:     
This short essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the classic film's appearance. With a great cast, it remains perhaps the most compelling portrayal of an American jury in action. I begin by noting eight details in Twelve Angry Men which are so obvious that their significance may be difficult to discern. I then discuss the significance of the film's being a drama, indeed, a drama about a drama. I discuss the kind of truth that a dramatic portrayal of the jury can aspire to and what it can add to social scientific accounts. Finally, I identify the six dramatic tensions that define the film's meaning.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Law & the Humanities, Litigation & Procedure, Legal History, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Burns, Robert P., Twelve Angry Men: A Jury Between Fact and Norm. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2007; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=988725

Contact Information

Robert P. Burns (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-6613 (Phone)
312-503-8977 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,053
Downloads: 470
Download Rank: 27,599
Footnotes:  72

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds