Twelve Angry Men: A Jury Between Fact and Norm
Robert P. Burns
Northwestern University - School of Law
Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2007
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-15
This short essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the classic film's appearance. With a great cast, it remains perhaps the most compelling portrayal of an American jury in action. I begin by noting eight details in Twelve Angry Men which are so obvious that their significance may be difficult to discern. I then discuss the significance of the film's being a drama, indeed, a drama about a drama. I discuss the kind of truth that a dramatic portrayal of the jury can aspire to and what it can add to social scientific accounts. Finally, I identify the six dramatic tensions that define the film's meaning.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: Law & the Humanities, Litigation & Procedure, Legal History, Jurisprudence & Legal PhilosophyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 25, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds