Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=988796
 
 

Footnotes (208)



 


 



The Legacy of Loving


Joanna L. Grossman


Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

John DeWitt Gregory


Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law


Howard Law Journal, Vol. 51, Fall 2007
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-21

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court sounded the death knell for anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. Virginia in 1967. This essay, published in honor of Loving's fortieth anniversary, considers the personal, cultural, and legal legacy of the decision, which brought an abrupt end to the practice of outlawing interracial marriage. But since those laws were already on the way out at the time Loving was decided, its legacy must be constructed by looking more broadly at its impact on American law and society. That exploration reveals first a powerful personal legacy for Mildred and Richard Loving, who were permitted to return to Virginia after having been forced to abandon their home, family, and friends. And couples like the Lovings were immediately able to celebrate their own marriages, even in states that still had laws prohibiting them from doing so. But it is not clear that the decision in Loving did much to promote greater marital integration between races. States ceased being able to ban interracial marriage, but removal of that obstacle did little to spur more of it. Even today, tremendous social and cultural barriers to interracial marriage exist, particularly between whites and African-Americans. The cultural legacy of Loving was thus, like the law's power to transform societal norms more generally, limited. Loving did have a meaningful impact on American law, however. Loving was neither just about marriage, nor just about race. It was, instead, a case that left a three-fold doctrinal legacy. Loving was crucial to the development of due process protection for marriage and related privacy rights, the enforcement of federal constitutional limits on state regulation of domestic relations, and the insistence that the equal protection clause be used as a sword to eliminate racial classifications and other practices that perpetuate racial subordination. Loving, which shaped two substantive constitutional doctrines and recalibrated the balance of federal-state power over domestic relations, thus deserves the "landmark case" status it is so often given.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Loving, miscegenation, and same-sex marriage

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 30, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Grossman, Joanna L. and Gregory, John DeWitt, The Legacy of Loving. Howard Law Journal, Vol. 51, Fall 2007; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=988796

Contact Information

Joanna L. Grossman (Contact Author)
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-5241 (Phone)
516-463-4800 (Fax)

Hofstra University Logo

John DeWitt Gregory
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
(516)463-5051 (Phone)

Hofstra University Logo

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,099
Downloads: 155
Download Rank: 111,771
Footnotes:  208

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds