SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (153)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Law Review Article Selection Process: Results from a National Study

Jason P. Nance
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Dylan J. Steinberg
U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Pennsylvania


July 18, 2007


Abstract:     
The student-edited law review has been a much criticized institution. Many commentators have expressed their belief that students are unqualified to determine which articles should be published in which journals, but these discussions have been largely based on anecdotal evidence of how journals make publication decisions. It was against that backdrop that we undertook a national survey of law reviews in an attempt to determine how student editors responsible for making publication decisions went about their task. This article compiles the results of that survey, which received 191 responses from 163 different journals. We analyzed 56 factors that influence the selection process and then grouped similar items together to form 17 constructs using factor analysis. Finally, we disaggregated the results to determine whether the results were significantly different based on the prestige of the journals involved. While many of our results confirm what has been widely assumed to be true, there are also some surprising findings. We found, for example, that Articles Editors seek to publish articles from well-known and widely-respected authors. It appears, however, that editors do not assume that prestigious authors produce the best scholarship, but instead they pursue the work of well-known authors because it can increase their journals' prestige within the legal academic community. The survey reveals that editors are not nearly as likely to seek out articles dealing with hot or trendy topics as some commentators have assumed, and that author diversity plays almost no role in the article selection process. We hope that our study will provide some structure to the ongoing debate about how best to use students in the law review publication process and will allow a more informed consideration of whether students are sufficiently well-trained to evaluate articles and whether they are using the proper criteria.

Keywords: law review, legal education

JEL Classifications: K00, I29

Working Paper Series

Date posted: May 25, 2007 ; Last revised: August 08, 2007

Suggested Citation

Nance, Jason P. and Steinberg, Dylan J., The Law Review Article Selection Process: Results from a National Study (July 18, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=988847


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Dylan J. Steinberg (Contact Author)
U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Pennsylvania ( email )
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Jason P. Nance
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ( email )
844 N. King Street
Room 6325
Wilmington, DE 19801
United States
302-573-6001 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,820
Downloads: 1,082
Download Rank: 4,333
Footnotes: 153

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.110 seconds.