Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=989085
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



The 'Stern Review' and its Critics: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis


Daniel H. Cole


Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs; Indiana University Bloomington - Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis

October 15, 2007


Abstract:     
The UK's Treasury's "Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change" (Oct. 2006) reached dramatically different conclusions and policy recommendations than most earlier economic analyses of climate change. It found that the costs of climate change, as well as the potential net benefits of greenhouse gas reductions, were much higher that previously estimated, and consequently recommended more rapid and extensive cuts in emissions than other economist analysts. The Stern Review estimated that a 1% annual investment of global GDP in mitigation could prevent a 5% (or more) reduction in annual global GDP from climate change harm, forever. A number of prominent economists, including William Nordhaus, Partha Dasgupta, Richard S.J. Tol, Robert Mendelsohn, and Martin Weitzman, have criticized the Stern Review on various grounds, including its damage estimates and the selection of parameter values (the utility discount rate and the elasticity of marginal utility), which affect the interest rate at which future costs and benefits are discounted to present value. This paper summarizes the Stern Review and its critiques, and assesses them from a process-oriented perspective to determine what they can teach us, positively and negatively, about how benefit-cost analyses (BCAs) should (or should not) be done.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis, discounting, discount rate, climate change

JEL Classification: D6, D81, D9, H4, K32, O1, Q2

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2007 ; Last revised: May 4, 2008

Suggested Citation

Cole, Daniel H., The 'Stern Review' and its Critics: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis (October 15, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=989085 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.989085

Contact Information

Daniel H. Cole (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs ( email )
1315 East Tenth Street
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Indiana University Bloomington - Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis ( email )
Indiana University Bloomington
Bloomington, IN
United States
(812) 855-4421 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,416
Downloads: 502
Download Rank: 31,467
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds