UCLA School of Law
April 4, 2010
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2012, 28(3): 381-406.
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 407
If a seller delivers a good non-conforming to contract, European and US warranty law allows consumers to choose between some money transfer and termination. Termination rights are, however, widely criticized, mainly for fear that the buyer may use non-conformity as a pretext for getting rid of a contract he no longer wants. We show that this possibility of "opportunistic termination" might actually have positive effects. Under some circumstances, it will lead to redistribution in favour of the buyer without any loss of efficiency. Moreover, by curbing the monopoly power of the seller, a regime involving termination might increase welfare by enabling a more efficient output level in a setting with multiple buyers. These potential benefits are absent if renegotiation is possible.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: contract law, warranties, breach remedies, termination, harmonization, comparative law.
JEL Classification: K12, C7, L40, D30
Date posted: May 29, 2007 ; Last revised: April 1, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.328 seconds