The President's Question Time: Power, Information and the Executive Credibility Gap
Western New England University School of Law
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 247, 2008
The rule of law depends on a working separation of powers and transparency and accountability in government. If information is power, the ability of one branch of government to control information represents the ability to control federal legislation, policy and decision-making. The framers of the United States Constitution developed the Madisonian model of separated powers and functions, and a system of checks and balances to maintain those separations, with this in mind. History has shown us a progressive shift of the power to control information toward the executive branch and away from the legislature. Particularly when unified, one-party government precludes effective Congressional investigations and oversight, little recourse exists for accessing information. This Article addresses an institutional design element that would increase transparency and accountability: periodic question-and-answer sessions between Congress and the President modeled on the UK's Prime Minister's Question Time. This makes the case for such a measure in the U.S. by examining the comparative political history and legal norms of the UK and the United States, and the need for a Question Time to increase government transparency and efficiency.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: constitutional law, comparative law, public policy, politicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 30, 2007 ; Last revised: December 28, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.468 seconds