|
||||
|
||||
Securities Underwriters in Public Capital Markets: The Existence, Parameters and Consequences of the Fiduciary Obligation to Avoid Conflicts
Andrew Tuch University of Sydney - Faculty of Law Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 51-84, April 2007 Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 07/36 Abstract: This article considers whether an investment bank, when acting as underwriter of a public securities offering, owes the issuing company the fiduciary obligation to avoid conflicts of interest. The question has not arisen for final judicial determination and has been overlooked by scholars and regulators. The highly lucrative and visible nature of underwriting work creates powerful incentives for investment banks to accept instructions in the face of this duty. At the same time, the web of loyalties that these institutions owe, by virtue of their broad and diverse range of products and services, creates intractable practical difficulties for compliance with the duty. The article considers the factual nature of the relationship between a securities underwriter and issuing company, the circumstances in which fiduciary obligations will exist outside the established fiduciary categories, and the existence, content and scope of any fiduciary obligation to avoid conflicts that arises. It also examines the practical and regulatory consequences for firms of the existence of such an obligation.
Keywords: investment bank, underwriter, conflicts of interest, fiduciary obligation, fiduciary relationship, initial public offering, regulation of financial institutions, financial services conglomerates JEL Classifications: E62, G24, K22, K10 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 31, 2007 ; Last revised: May 31, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.141 seconds.