|
||||
|
||||
Heads or Tails?: A Modest Proposal for Deciding Close ElectionsMichael J. PittsIndiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law December 2006 Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 739, December 2006 Abstract: Elections are fundamentally imperfect. For instance, machines break down and lines are long. A few elections are incredibly close, with only a few tenths of a percentage point or a couple of votes separating the candidates. A very small number of elections end in a dead-even draw. When this happens the winner is often decided by a game of chance -- a hand of poker, the drawing of lots, or the flip of a coin. In this brief, lighthearted Essay, the author develops the argument that because elections are fundamentally imperfect it makes sense to use a coin flip to decide the winners of close elections; that perhaps instead of relying on a curious alchemy of recounts and litigation to resolve close elections, we should rely on a different kind of alchemy -- the alchemy of the United States Mint.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 Keywords: elections, voting, democracy, law Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: June 7, 2007 ; Last revised: February 18, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds