Of Katz and Aliens: Privacy Expectations and the Immigration Raids
Raquel E. Aldana
University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law
UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2008
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-02
This article examines privacy rights for noncitizens in the context of the recent immigration raids in peoples' homes and the workplace. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement office is conducting these raids with general or defective warrants and executes them in a discriminate dragnet-style, mostly against Latinos. The Fourth Amendment, however, provides little protection to immigrants and their families. The author explores how law's construction of immigrants' illegality interplay with Fourth Amendment doctrines of consent, reasonable expectation of privacy, pretextual stops, and administrative searches to deny immigrants privacy's protection. As well, the author explores the spread of immigration databases and the proliferation of federal and local regulation spaces occupied by immigrants within the border to examine the legal justifications for these generalized and defective warrants. The author concludes by urging courts to reconsider reliance on immigrants' unlawful presence in the U.S. to excuse law enforcement abuses and offers several legal and policy reasons in favor of privacy protection for noncitizens.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 66
Keywords: Immigration, Fourth Amendment, Criminal Procedure, Privacy
JEL Classification: K39, K42, K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 12, 2007 ; Last revised: February 27, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds