SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (40)

Beta

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 


 



Did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Affect Corporate Risk-Taking? The Study of Cross-Listed Companies

Kate Litvak
Northwestern University - School of Law; Northwestern University - Department of Finance


June 2007

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 108

Abstract:     
This paper uses a triple difference approach to test a popular hypothesis that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act induced firms to lower their risk levels. Because SOX applies to all US public companies, a US-based test cannot rule out other possible causes of changes in risk levels. A cleaner test is available for cross-listed firms: SOX applies to firms cross-listed in the US on levels 2 and 3, but not to firms cross-listed on levels 1 and 4; it also does not apply to foreign non-cross-listed firms. I match each cross-listed firm to a similar non-cross-listed firm from the same country, and measure the pair-level risk - the difference between the risk of a cross-listed firm and the risk of its match (first difference). I then estimate the after-minus-before SOX changes in pair-level risk (second difference). Finally, I compare the after-minus-before changes in pair risk levels of pairs where the cross-listed company is listed on level 2 or 3 (and thus subject to SOX) and pairs where the cross-listed company is listed on level 1 or 4 (and thus not subject to SOX) (third difference). I use three sets of proxies for risk: volatility of returns, balance sheet liquidity, and leverage. I find that the volatility of returns of level-23 firms declined significantly after SOX, compared to non-cross-listed firms and level-14 firms. Liquidity of level-23 firms increased (and therefore risk declined), compared to non-cross-listed firms and level-14 firms. High-growth and high-Tobin's Q firms, as well as firms whose Tobin's Q declined more strongly during the period when SOX was adopted, experienced the largest decreases in volatility and increases in liquidity. Leverage declined significantly only for high-growth companies. Firms that were more volatile before the adoption of SOX experienced significantly stronger declines in their Tobin's Q than less volatile firms. This evidence is consistent with the view that SOX placed particular burden on riskier firms and induced firms to take less risk, especially high-growth and already well-governed firms.

Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley Act, cross-listing, corporate governance, risk, volatility, securities regulation

JEL Classifications: K00, K22, G3, G15, G34, G38

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 05, 2007 ; Last revised: January 29, 2008

Suggested Citation

Litvak, Kate, Did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Affect Corporate Risk-Taking? The Study of Cross-Listed Companies (June 2007). U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 108. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=994584


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Kate Litvak (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Northwestern University - Department of Finance ( email )
2001 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 20
Downloads: 5
References: 40
Citations: 1

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 5 in 0.282 seconds.