Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (35)



 


 



Why No Respect? The Contractual Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Delaware


Ann E. Conaway


Widener University - School of Law

June 17, 2007

Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-05

Abstract:     
The thesis of this paper focuses on the statutory policy of "freedom of contract" in Delaware unincorporated entity law and the confusion of some courts in applying these contractarian principles in the face of, what would have been, traditional fiduciary duties. What has resulted is a muddle in the case law caused by the similarity in the terms good faith, in the context of the duty of good faith in contract law, and the term good faith as it is used in the law of business organizations to describe a fiduciary duty of care or the standard of conduct for a director in a corporation. Similarly, puzzlement results when litigators or courts mistakenly interchange the contract term fair dealing with the judicial standard of entire fairness traditionally reserved for the review of conduct by disloyal fiduciaries. In Delaware, it is time for corporate principles to remain in the realm of corporate law and the corpfuscation of unincorporated law to end.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Delaware corporations, good faith

JEL Classification: d23, G30

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2007 ; Last revised: February 15, 2008

Suggested Citation

Conaway, Ann E. , Why No Respect? The Contractual Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Delaware (June 17, 2007). Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=994624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.994624

Contact Information

Ann E. Conaway (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,531
Downloads: 290
Download Rank: 50,155
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  35

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.547 seconds