Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=995299
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (89)



 


 



Reviewing the Sentencing Guidelines: Judicial Politics, Empirical Evidence, and Reform


Max M. Schanzenbach


Northwestern University - School of Law

Emerson H. Tiller


Northwestern University - School of Law

June 2007

Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-17

Abstract:     
This article presents the first large-scale empirical study of federal guidelines sentencing that matches offenders to the sentencing judge. We confirm the widely-held belief that political ideology matters in criminal sentencing - specifically, Republican-appointed judges give longer sentences than Democrat-appointees with regard to certain crimes. More interestingly, we find evidence consistent with positive political theory that such decision making is nested within the broader political-ideological relationship of the sentencing judge and the overseeing circuit court. We find, for example, that Democrat-appointed judges depart from the Sentencing Guidelines to give shorter sentences more often and to a greater degree when the reviewing court is politically aligned (circuit majority Democrat-appointed) than when not aligned (circuit majority Republican-appointed). We then discuss the Supreme Court's evolving sentencing jurisprudence and the likely impact of alternatives to the present system. We conclude that Guidelines improves sentencing consistency and preserves the benefit of appellate review. We also proposes two potential reforms: first, mandating open access to judge identifiers in sentencing data for researchers to study sources of judicial bias; and, second, mandating ideologically mixed appellate panels for review of criminal sentences to prevent the more extreme instances of ideological alignment that frequently occur between district and circuit court panels that lead to more extreme outcomes in sentencing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: Judicial decision-making, criminal law, sentencing, political science

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 21, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Schanzenbach, Max M. and Tiller, Emerson H., Reviewing the Sentencing Guidelines: Judicial Politics, Empirical Evidence, and Reform (June 2007). Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=995299 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.995299

Contact Information

Max Matthew Schanzenbach (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Emerson H. Tiller
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,333
Downloads: 283
Download Rank: 61,856
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  89

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds