Citations (1)


Footnotes (97)



Bulletproof: Mandatory Rules for Deal Protections

Brian JM Quinn

BC Law School

Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 32, No. 4, Summer 2007
Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 349

This Article provides an economic analysis of mechanisms that protect negotiated acquisitions of companies and explains the need for a mandatory rule limiting the use of such mechanisms. The Delaware courts have in fact imposed restrictions on various forms of deal protection without recognizing a consistent underlying economic logic to their decisions and without establishing a consistent principle governing different forms of deal protection. At the same time, practitioners continue to push the edge of the envelope seeking ways to create stronger deal protection. I argue that when viewed together from an economic perspective, the courts' somewhat ad hoc decisions relating to deal protection are consistent with the efficiency objective underlying corporate law and should be bolstered rather than undermined. Specifically, I argue that sellers should be prohibited from providing buyers in non-Revlon transactions with "bulletproof" protection. Instead, sellers should be permitted to provide limited protection only to the extent necessary to compensate bidders for the transaction and opportunity costs of making bids. A well-measured termination fee should be sufficient for this purpose.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Corporate and Securities Law

JEL Classification: K22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2007 ; Last revised: December 10, 2007

Suggested Citation

Quinn, Brian JM, Bulletproof: Mandatory Rules for Deal Protections. Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 32, No. 4, Summer 2007; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 349. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=995602

Contact Information

Brian JM Quinn (Contact Author)
BC Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,821
Downloads: 336
Download Rank: 59,171
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  97

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds