Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=995777
 
 

Footnotes (131)



 


 



The Establishment Clause and Religious Expression in Governmental Settings: Four Variables in Search of a Standard


Daniel O. Conkle


Indiana University Maurer School of Law


110 West Virginia Law Review 315 (2007)
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 81

Abstract:     
In his controversial but controlling opinion in Van Orden v. Perry, Justice Breyer rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Texas State Capital. Breyer argued that existing Establishment Clause formulations, including the Lemon and endorsement tests, were inadequate to resolve the case, so he relied instead on legal judgment, an approach informed by doctrinal and policy considerations but not controlled by any formal test.

In this Essay, I suggest that Justice Breyer may have been right in Van Orden-if not in his result, then at least in approaching the question as he did. More generally, I suggest that the search for a clear-cut doctrinal test or rule for religious expression in governmental settings, complete with yes-or-no check-off points, may be a mistaken or futile venture. There simply are too many constitutional values at work, and too many relevant variables.

In lieu of a categorical test or rule, I explore the possibility of a multivariable standard for resolving Establishment Clause questions in this context. Under this approach, the Supreme Court would consider four constitutional variables, which I link to a range of relevant and intersecting constitutional values. The variables address such factors as governmental coercion or aggressiveness, the nature and specificity of the religious expression, tradition, and the extent to which the expression is governmentally-as opposed to privately-crafted or sponsored. I explain and elaborate by applying the multivariable standard to easy cases, not-so-easy cases, and hard cases, including not only Van Orden but also the unresolved controversy over the under God language in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Interpretation, First Amendment, Establishment Clause, Religious Expression and Symbolism, Religious Liberty, Religious Free Speech, Ten Commandments, Pledge of Allegiance, Justice Breyer

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19, K30, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 21, 2007 ; Last revised: June 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Conkle, Daniel O., The Establishment Clause and Religious Expression in Governmental Settings: Four Variables in Search of a Standard. 110 West Virginia Law Review 315 (2007); Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 81. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=995777

Contact Information

Daniel O. Conkle (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
(812) 855-4331 (Phone)
(812) 855-0555 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 671
Downloads: 88
Download Rank: 173,573
Footnotes:  131

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds