Presidential Signing Statements in Perspective
George Mason University School of Law
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 95-112, 2007
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 07-24
Presidential signing statements that object to putatively unconstitutional statutory provisions, or interpret them to avoid constitutional difficulties, have long been common, and occasionally controversial. After an outburst of sensational journalism last year, the American Bar Association followed up with a report accusing President Bush of using these statements to threaten what it called "the rule of law and our constitutional system of separation of powers." In this brief symposium contribution, I hope to indicate why the ABA's position is analytically untenable and irresponsibly hyperbolic, but also to raise a more interesting set of questions about the similarities and differences between the ways that courts and Presidents do and should go about the task of interpreting the Constitution and laws.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: signing statement, presentment clause, line item veto, take care clauseAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 25, 2007 ; Last revised: November 7, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds