Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=996140
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (177)



 


 



Retributive Justice in the Real World


Michael T. Cahill


Brooklyn Law School


Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 815, 2007
Brooklyn Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 77

Abstract:     
There are two commonly recognized "theories" of criminal law: utilitarianism, which sees criminal law's purpose as preventing future harms; and retributivism, which sees criminal law's purpose as punishing past wrongs. One significant but little-discussed difference between the two theories relates to their relative scope: in a meaningful way, utilitarianism presents itself as a complete theory of criminal law, while retributivism does not.

Utilitarianism provides a comprehensive vision of criminal justice that can offer guidance, or at least a clear agenda, regarding both the content of criminal law and the best means for enforcing it. Retributivism, on the other hand, apparently speaks only to the criminal law's design, and not to its implementation. Retributive theory seems to say nothing about how to make the tradeoffs and compromises necessary to "do" criminal justice in the real world, whose inevitable resource constraints and other limitations prevent the system from imposing the full deserved punishment on every offender.

This article explores and evaluates the range of options for developing a real-world legal theory, as opposed to an idealized moral theory, of retributive punishment. It concludes that perhaps the only effective, or even plausible, option for doing so would be to adopt the approach of "consequentialist retributivism," which sees desert-based punishment as a goal to maximize rather than (as other approaches would demand) a categorical ex ante commitment. Interestingly, though this seems like the most intuitively sensible way to implement retributive justice, it is the approach with the least support in the theoretical literature. Thus, this article further seeks to advance the debate by suggesting the appeal (and perhaps the necessity) of employing the hitherto neglected perspective of consequentialist retributivism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: criminal law, punishment, retribution

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Cahill, Michael T., Retributive Justice in the Real World. Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 815, 2007; Brooklyn Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 77. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=996140

Contact Information

Michael T. Cahill (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
718-780-7943 (Phone)
718-780-0376 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.brooklaw.edu/faculty//profile/?page=267

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,733
Downloads: 487
Download Rank: 31,073
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  177

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds