Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=996629
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (69)



 


 



Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, and New Data on Capital Cases


Samuel R. Gross


University of Michigan Law School

Barbara O'Brien


Michigan State University - College of Law

September 2007

2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 93
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-14

Abstract:     
In the first part of this paper we address the problems inherent in studying wrongful convictions: our pervasive ignorance and the extreme difficulty of obtaining the data that we need to answer even basic questions. The main reason that we know so little about false convictions is that, by definition, they are hidden from view. As a result, it is nearly impossible to gather reliable data on the characteristics or even the frequency of false convictions. In addition, we have very limited data on criminal investigations and prosecutions in general, so even if we could somehow obtain data on cases of wrongful conviction, we would have inadequate data on true convictions to compare them to.

In the second part we dispel some of that ignorance by considering data on false convictions in a small but important subset of criminal cases about which we have unusually detailed information: death sentences. From 1973 on we know basic facts about all defendants who were sentenced to death in the United States, and we know which of them were exonerated. From these data we estimate that the frequency of wrongful death sentences in the United States is at least 2.3%. In addition, we compare post-1973 capital exonerations in the United States to a random sample of cases of defendants who were sentenced in the same time period and ultimately executed. Based on these comparisons we present a handful of findings on features of the investigations of capital cases, and on background facts about capital defendants, that are modest predictors of false convictions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: wrongful convictions, exonerations, capital punishment

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Gross, Samuel R. and O'Brien, Barbara, Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, and New Data on Capital Cases (September 2007). 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper; U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 93; MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=996629 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.996629

Contact Information

Samuel R. Gross (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-764-1519 (Phone)
734-764-8309 (Fax)

Barbara O'Brien
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,488
Downloads: 585
Download Rank: 24,226
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  69

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds