Effective Brief Writing Despite High Volume Practice: Ten Misconceptions that Result in Bad Briefs
Sarah E. Ricks
Rutgers School of Law - Camden
Jane L. Istvan
City of Philadelphia Law Department
University of Toledo Law Review, Vol. 38, p. 1113, Summer 2007
This article can help lawyers (and law students) avoid ten of the most common ways to write a bad brief.
There is an art to writing effective briefs and each brief is different. But many ineffective briefs contain the same mistakes, regardless of the brief's subject matter or the brief's intended judicial audience. Many recurring brief writing errors may be caused by the demands of a high volume law practice, which allow little time for the brief writer to achieve the critical distance from the document necessary to edit and revise effectively.
Lawyers can avoid committing many common brief writing errors if they are more able to put themselves in the place of their intended readers, the busy judge and the often inexperienced law clerk. Understanding recurring brief writing misconceptions and errors can assist lawyers in assessing the effectiveness of a brief from the perspective of the intended reader.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: legal writing, brief writing, advocacy, appellate advocacy, editing, judicial audienceAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 11, 2007
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds