Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=997949
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



An Empirical Examination of Product and Litigant-Specific Theories for the Divergence between NAFTA Chapter 19 and U.S. Judicial Review


Juscelino F. Colares


Case Western Reserve University School of Law

September 17, 2008

Journal of World Trade, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 691-722, 2008
2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
Empirical analysis of NAFTA panel review has shown that panels reverse US agency trade remedy determinations twice as often as US courts. Recent studies have eliminated case selection and other hypotheses as potential explanations for this divergence. In this article, Probit regressions show that case docket differences, such as type of import or litigant identity, also cannot account for this discrepancy. As NAFTA panels must apply the same law and standards of review as the US courts they replace, this divergence presents serious questions regarding US Congressional acquiescence to the operation of NAFTA panels and encourages discussion of the role or absence of popular preferences in the trade policy process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: empirical, international trade, NAFTA Chapter 19 panels, judicial review, divergence, asymmetric decisions, trade remedies, AD/CVD law, agency determinations, deference, public choice, capture, trade liberalization

JEL Classification: F13, F53, F55, K33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 5, 2007 ; Last revised: October 7, 2008

Suggested Citation

Colares, Juscelino F., An Empirical Examination of Product and Litigant-Specific Theories for the Divergence between NAFTA Chapter 19 and U.S. Judicial Review (September 17, 2008). Journal of World Trade, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 691-722, 2008; 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=997949 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997949

Contact Information

Juscelino F. Colares (Contact Author)
Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,172
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 141,370
Footnotes:  108

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.438 seconds