Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=998388
 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



The Plot Thickens: The Appellate Brief as Story


Kenneth D. Chestek


University of Wyoming College of Law

December 18, 2007


Abstract:     
Why are appellate briefs boring? Does overreliance on structural paradigms like IRAC lead to formulaic, and overly legalistic, writing? The author suggests that, by conceiving of briefs as stories and consciously using the elements of narrative (character, conflict, setting, theme, and plot, among others), the brief writer can make the client's story come to life for the reader, hopefully producing a more interesting, and therefore compelling, brief. The author has written a brief in a mock case (Rubin v. Old York Department of Social Services), and then deconstructs the brief in the article to show how the author intentionally used the elements of narrative to write a compelling brief in a difficult legal setting. The brief and the record it is based upon are also available for download on SSRN.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Appellate brief, Narrative theory, storytelling, legal writing

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2007 ; Last revised: June 5, 2012

Suggested Citation

Chestek, Kenneth D., The Plot Thickens: The Appellate Brief as Story (December 18, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=998388 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.998388

Contact Information

Kenneth D. Chestek (Contact Author)
University of Wyoming College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 3035
Laramie, WY 82071
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.uwyo.edu/law/faculty-and-staff/kenneth-chestek.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,653
Downloads: 829
Download Rank: 15,409
Footnotes:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds