|
||||
|
||||
What Does Tort Law Deter? Precaution and Activity Levels in No-Fault Automobile Insurance
Alan C. Marco Washington and Lee University; Vassar College - Department of Economics Casey Salvietti Vassar College - Department of Economics November 2007 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper Abstract: Most studies on no-fault automobile insurance examine either fatalities per vehicle mile or fatalities per capita. However, it is well established in the analysis of tort law that tort liability can have incentive effects on both precaution level and activity level. In this paper we separate precaution effects from activity level effects to determine both the total effect of no-fault automobile insurance on fatalities per capita and miles per capita and the component effects of no-fault on fatalities per mile, miles per vehicle, and vehicles per capita. We find that no-fault laws have a significant effect on fatalities per mile and fatalities per capita, but (mostly) insignificant effects on miles per vehicle, vehicles per capita, and miles per capita. We conclude that the deterrence effect of tort law is stronger on precaution than it is on activity level.
Keywords: No-fault automobile insurance, tort, deterrence JEL Classifications: K13 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 06, 2007 ; Last revised: November 11, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.110 seconds.