SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (2)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (66)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp?

Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Bhaven N. Sampat
Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health


October 21, 2008

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 999098
2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
A growing chorus of voices is sounding a common refrain - the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is issuing far too many bad patents. These criticisms are complicated by the rather surprising fact that we don't actually know what percentage of patent applications actually issue as patents. In this paper, we use a novel dataset of all published patent applications filed in January 2001 to estimate the grant rate. These data also allow us to examine the uses of continuation applications, and to assess dynamics of applicant-examiner interaction over the patent prosecution process. We find that the PTO rejects a surprisingly high percentage of patents. While more than two-thirds of all applications result in at least one patent, a significant number of applications are rejected and then finally abandoned by the applicant. We also find that the likelihood of obtaining a patent varies significantly by industry, but in surprising ways. Finally, despite a variety of reforms that might be thought to reduce the use and abuse of continuation applications, we find a high use of continuation applications of various types.

Keywords: patent, patents, USPTO, intellectual property

JEL Classifications: 034, K00

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 09, 2007 ; Last revised: October 23, 2008

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A. and Sampat, Bhaven N., Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? (October 21, 2008). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 999098; 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=999098


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Bhaven N. Sampat (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health ( email )
600 West 168th St. 6th Floor
New York, NY 10032
United States
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,889
Downloads: 493
Download Rank: 14,537
Citations: 2
Footnotes: 66

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.