Citations (1)



Deciding Recusal Motions: Who Judges the Judges?

Leslie W. Abramson

Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 543, 1994

This Article discusses judicial impartiality as a significant element of justice. It is well established that judges should decide legal disputes free of any personal bias or prejudice. When a conflict of interest arises a judge may be unable to maintain impartiality and thus should be disqualified from the case. This Article deals with whether, and under what circumstances, a judge must, may, or cannot refer a motion to disqualify to another judge. Contrary to the traditional majority approach which leaves the decision on any motion to the challenged judge, this Article also suggests that the reasons alleged for the conflict of interest should determine the identity of the decision maker.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: judicial ethics

JEL Classification: K4

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Abramson, Leslie W., Deciding Recusal Motions: Who Judges the Judges?. Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 543, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=999427

Contact Information

Leslie W. Abramson (Contact Author)
Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.louisville.edu/

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,587
Downloads: 313
Download Rank: 70,710
Citations:  1
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality
By Charles Geyh

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds