Method and Madness in Copyright Law
Dan L. Burk
University of California, Irvine School of Law
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34
Black letter copyright law holds that methods and processes, as well as facts and ideas, are excluded from the subject matter of copyright. This doctrine extends back at least to the iconic Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Selden. But recent copyright cases have protected as copyrightable subject matter compilations of numerical values that are the products of calculation processes, such that protection of the final results seems tantamount to protection of the underlying process. These cases not only tread the line between fact and original expression, but underscore the difficulty of separating process from product in copyright. A careful examination of these decisions uncovers powerful but questionable philosophical assumptions embedded in copyright jurisprudence, and reveals hidden lacunae within the copyright statute that call into question the continuity and viability of current copyright doctrine.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: copyright, determinism, fact, expression, intellectual property, software, processes
JEL Classification: O31, O33, O34, L86, K30, K40
Date posted: July 12, 2007 ; Last revised: October 6, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds