|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id999546. ; Size: 103K
|
|
The Practice of Value - Reply
Joseph Raz
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; Columbia University - Law School
THE PRACTICE OF VALUE, R. Jay Wallace, ed., Oxford University Press, 2003
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper
Abstract:
The privilege of having three sets of extensive and hard-hitting comments on one's work is as welcome as it is rare, and especially so on this occasion as the lectures were, for me, but thefirst (well, not entirely first) stab at a subject I hope to explore at greater length. The reflectionsthat follow will respond to some of the criticisms, but will not be a point by point reply. I will use the occasion to clarify some obscurities in the lectures, and to contrast my view with some of my critics' own positions. I will proceed thematically, starting with some observations about method and about ontology, proceeding to explore several questions about the relations between social dependence and relativism, between genre, value, and normativity, and concluding with a fewwords on pluralism and liberal values.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: Jurisprudence, Korsgaard, Value
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: July 11, 2007
Suggested CitationRaz, Joseph, The Practice of Value - Reply. THE PRACTICE OF VALUE, R. Jay Wallace, ed., Oxford University Press, 2003; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=999546
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
