Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=224728
 
 

Citations



 


 



The 'Fair' is the Enemy of the Good: Ortiz V. Fibreboard Corporation and Class Action Settlements


George M. Cohen


University of Virginia School of Law

2000

UVA Law School, Legal Studies Working Paper No. 00-09

Abstract:     
This article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation, which struck down a massive asbestos class action settlement as inconsistent with the requirements of Rule 23, in particular the requirements for a mandatory class action based on a limited fund under Rule 23(b)(1)(B). Although agreeing with the Court's decision, the article criticizes the Court for relying too much on abstract principle rather than directly responding to the pragmatic concerns raised by the dissent. The article considers the incentives of Fibreboard, its insurers, the claimants and their lawyers in the negotiations leading up to the settlement and argues that Fibreboard could not settle its coverage dispute with its insurers without also resolving the asbestos claims themselves. The article then examines the group settlements that Fibreboard entered into before negotiating the class settlement and shows how these settlements could have facilitated a collusive class settlement. With respect to the Court's limited fund analysis, the article shows how a more detailed appreciation of the background could have improved the Court's reasoning. First, the article shows why there could not have been a limited fund. Second, the article argues that the Court's analysis of "extraclass" conflict was too narrow, while its analysis of "intraclass" conflicts was too broad. Third, the article examines the failure of the class settlement to exhaust Fibreboard's assets and relates that failure to Fibreboard's obligations to the asbestos claimants. Fourth, the article explains why the Court should have paid more attention to a companion class action settlement to Ortiz. The article concludes by arguing that courts should continue the task set by Ortiz of developing a meaningful law of class action settlements and in doing so should pay more attention to the details of the deals they oversee.

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 31, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Cohen, George M., The 'Fair' is the Enemy of the Good: Ortiz V. Fibreboard Corporation and Class Action Settlements (2000). Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 8, 2000 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=224728

Contact Information

George M. Cohen (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
(804) 924-3814 (Phone)
(804) 982-2079 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,340

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds