Limiting Patentees' Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies
Yale University - Yale Law School; Yale University - Yale School of Management
University of Oxford - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 97, P. 985, 1999
Allowing patentees to profit from their patents encourages innovation. However, legal scholars have failed to appreciate that unconstrained monopoly pricing is socially inefficient, in that the last bit of monopoly pricing produces large amounts of deadweight loss for a relatively small amount of patentee profit. Uncertainty and delay in patent litigation may be a way of giving patentees constrained market power to reduce this inefficiency. It is possible to limit patentee's market power without reducing their incentives to innovate. Because the profit curve is "stationary" at the profit-maximizing price, small reduction from the monopoly price will not substantially reduce the patentee's incentive to innovate (but will yield substantial decreases in the dead weight loss). And more substantial reduction in monopoly pricing can be efficiently offset by increases in patent duration. Society would be better off giving patentees limited market power for a longer period rather than giving patentees monopoly power for a shorter period.
Date posted: June 6, 1999
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.157 seconds