Announcements

THE SOCIAL INSURANCE RESEARCH NETWORK (SIRN), sponsored by the National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) The Social Insurance Research Network (SIRN), directed by Larry Atkins, President, National Academy of Social Insurance, is an online venue providing access to scholarly research and professional announcements in the Social Insurance community. Social Insurance includes the systems for insuring workers and their families against economic insecurity caused by the loss of income from work and the cost of health care, such as Social Security, Medicare, Workers' Compensation, unemployment insurance, related social assistance and private employee benefits. NASI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization made up of the nation's leading experts on social insurance. Its mission is to promote understanding and informed policymaking on social insurance and related programs through research, public education, training, and the open exchange of ideas. SIRN is dedicated to increasing communication among social insurance scholars, practitioners, and policy makers throughout the world.


Table of Contents

From Status-Based Privilege to Old Age Security: Rethinking Public Pension Reform in China

Qian Hao, China University of Political Science and Law

Recruiting and Retaining High-Quality State and Local Workers: Do Pensions Matter?

Alicia H. Munnell, Boston College - Center for Retirement Research
Jean-Pierre Aubry, Boston College - Center for Retirement Research
Geoffrey Sanzenbacher, Boston College Economics Department

Measuring and Communicating Social Security Earnings Replacement Rates

Andrew G. Biggs, American Enterprise Institute
Gaobo Pang, Towers Watson
Sylvester J. Schieber, Towers Watson

Reforming Old Age Security: Effects and Alternatives

Nicholas-James Clavet, Laval University
Jean-Yves Duclos, Laval University, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Bernard Fortin, Laval University
Steeve Marchand, Laval University

The Implications of Differential Trends in Mortality for Social Security Policy

John Bound, University of Michigan, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Arline T. Geronimus, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - School of Public Health
Javier M. Rodriguez, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
Timothy Waidmann, The Urban Institute

Creating French-Style Pension Funds: Business, Labour and the Battle Over Patient Capital

Marek Naczyk, Sciences Po Paris - Centre d’études européennes, Sciences Po Paris - LIEPP


SOCIAL SECURITY, PENSIONS & RETIREMENT INCOME eJOURNAL

"From Status-Based Privilege to Old Age Security: Rethinking Public Pension Reform in China" Free Download
UMKC Law Review, Volume 82, Number 4, Summer 2014

QIAN HAO, China University of Political Science and Law
Email:

Pension reform poses a formidable challenge to China’s development and has become a topic of intensive debate in recent years. Nonetheless, various reform measures based on legislations adopted since the 1980s have largely failed to be implemented, including the 1997 three-pillar pension plan. While the current debate on pension reform in China centers on how to address the financial crisis of the public pension system, this article argues that widening pension deficit has been only a symptom rather than the root cause of the reform stalemate. China’s old socialist pension benefits were developed as a status-based privilege rather than provision of old age economic security. As China transits from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, the old pension system has increasingly become inadequate and inequitable. The remaining socialist pension obligations are incompatible with the emerging market, and the majority of the population is exposed to market risks without protection in retirement. However, those structural challenges have not been successfully addressed by deficit-driven reform plans or short-sighted measures that focus on having current workers pay for the heavy cost of pensions for retirees under the previous system. The right reform strategy will require that efforts be redirected towards addressing the fundamental transition issues.

"Recruiting and Retaining High-Quality State and Local Workers: Do Pensions Matter?" Free Download
Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Working Paper No. 2015-1

ALICIA H. MUNNELL, Boston College - Center for Retirement Research
Email:
JEAN-PIERRE AUBRY, Boston College - Center for Retirement Research
Email:
GEOFFREY SANZENBACHER, Boston College Economics Department
Email:

Many state and local governments have responded to challenges facing their pension plans by cutting benefits. Will these cuts make it harder for state and local governments to recruit and retain high-quality workers? To date, the answer has been difficult to obtain; most micro-level datasets contain information on the existence of pensions but not on pension generosity. To get around this constraint, this study uses a unique source, the Public Plans Database, to obtain data on the pension generosity of state and local workers’ pensions. These data are merged with the Current Population Survey to investigate how pension generosity affects the gap between the private sector wage of workers that states and localities recruit from the private sector relative to the workers that they lose to it. The findings suggest relatively generous pensions help reduce this “quality gap,? making it easier for state and local employers to recruit high-earning workers from the private sector and retain those workers. The effect is similar regardless of whether employer or employee contributions finance the benefits. The study suggests states should be cautious as they cut their pension benefits and that a strategy to maintain benefits by shifting some costs onto employees may help maintain states’ ability to recruit and retain high-quality workers.

"Measuring and Communicating Social Security Earnings Replacement Rates" Free Download

ANDREW G. BIGGS, American Enterprise Institute
Email:
GAOBO PANG, Towers Watson
Email:
SYLVESTER J. SCHIEBER, Towers Watson
Email:

Financial advisors commonly use earnings replacement rates to assist workers in their retirement planning. Policymakers and analysts use them to gauge the adequacy of Social Security benefits and other retirement income in allowing retirees to maintain preretirement living standards. In recent years, the Social Security trustees regularly published replacement rates that have been widely interpreted as the extent to which Social Security benefits replace earnings of workers at various points in the lifetime earnings distribution. However, the trustees’ replacement rates are calculated differently than those generally used for retirement planning purposes possibly leading to confusion among policymakers and others regarding how much of workers’ earnings are replaced by Social Security and how much those workers need to save on their own for retirement. Financial planners calculate replacement rates by comparing an individual’s retirement income to that same individual’s pre-retirement earnings, generally earnings in the years immediately preceding retirement. The Social Security Administration, by contrast, effectively calculates replacement rates by comparing retiree incomes to the incomes of contemporaneous workers. This latter measure is often used in other countries, but differs both qualitatively and quantitatively from the more common replacement rate calculations used for financial planning purposes. We find that replacement rates calculated on a financial planning basis are generally higher than those published by the Social Security trustees and that Social Security benefits generally replace somewhat more of individual workers’ earnings than the trustees’ rates suggest.

"Reforming Old Age Security: Effects and Alternatives" Free Download
Industrial Alliance Research Chair on the Economics Working Paper 14-10

NICHOLAS-JAMES CLAVET, Laval University
Email:
JEAN-YVES DUCLOS, Laval University, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Email:
BERNARD FORTIN, Laval University
Email:
STEEVE MARCHAND, Laval University
Email:

The federal government announced in its 2012 budget its intention to delay the age of eligibility for Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement from 65 to 67 years. By the time the policy is fully implemented (i.e., in 2030), this delay will have increased net revenues of the federal government by 7.1 billion dollars per year (in constant 2014 dollars), but will reduce net provincial revenues by 638 million dollars. With constant labour and savings behaviour, this delay would also increase the percentage of individuals aged 65 and 66 years who are in the low income group from 6% to 17% (for an additional 100,00 low-income seniors in this age group) and would be most harmful to low-income seniors and to women. Alternative reforms to the Old Age Security could make it possible to achieve similar effects on public finances without having such large impacts on the low income rate among seniors.

"The Implications of Differential Trends in Mortality for Social Security Policy" Free Download

JOHN BOUND, University of Michigan, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Email:
ARLINE T. GERONIMUS, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - School of Public Health
Email:
JAVIER M. RODRIGUEZ, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
Email:
TIMOTHY WAIDMANN, The Urban Institute
Email:

While increased life expectancy in the U.S. has been used as justification for raising the Social Security retirement ages, independent researchers have reported that life expectancy declined in recent decades for white women with less than a high school education. However, there has been a dramatic rise in educational attainment in the U.S. over the 20th century suggesting a more adversely selected population with low levels of education. Using data from the National Vital Statistics System and the U.S. Census from 1990-2010, we examine the robustness of earlier findings to several modifications in the assumptions and methodology employed. We categorize education in terms of relative rank in the overall distribution, rather than by credentials or years of education, and estimate trends in mortality for the bottom quartile. We also consider race and gender specific changes in the distribution of life expectancy. We found no evidence that survival probabilities declined for the bottom quartile of educational attainment. Nor did distributional analyses find any subgroup experienced absolute declines in survival probabilities. We conclude that recent dramatic and highly publicized estimates of worsening mortality rates among non-Hispanic whites who did not graduate from high school are highly sensitive to alternative approaches to asking the fundamental questions implied. However, it does appear that low SES groups are not sharing equally in improving mortality conditions, which raises concerns about the differential impacts of policies that would raise retirement ages uniformly in response to average increases in life expectancy.

"Creating French-Style Pension Funds: Business, Labour and the Battle Over Patient Capital" Free Download

MAREK NACZYK, Sciences Po Paris - Centre d’études européennes, Sciences Po Paris - LIEPP
Email:

Over the past few decades, European governments have increasingly retreated from public pension provision and promoted the expansion of private retirement savings accounts. Analysts of comparative social policy have traditionally considered that the politics of pension privatisation has been driven by politicians’ and socio-economic actors’ concerns about the relative generosity and costs of different pension arrangements. But, when they are fully-funded instead of being financed on a pay-as-you-go basis, pension arrangements generate funds that are injected into the financial system. The existence of such a welfare-finance nexus means that stakeholders in the pension system are also attentive to how pension funds invest their assets, and may try to actively shape the institutional design of old-age pensions in accordance with such concerns. This paper focuses on the role of socio-economic actors – employers, trade unions and the financial services industry – in pension privatisation and develops theoretical expectations on how these actors’ interest in maximising control over private pension plans’ financial assets affects pension politics. The argument is tested with a case study of French pension debates between the 1980s and the 2000s.

^top

About this eJournal

This eJournal distributes working and accepted paper abstracts on all topics related to old age pensions and retirement. This includes papers on social security, employment based pensions and other publicly provided or tax-favored mechanisms for retirement income. The journal welcomes submissions from any discipline and a broad range of topic areas, including benefit adequacy, pension finance, the design and reform of social security and pension systems, retirement policy, and comparative analyses of U.S. pension and retirement issues with those of other countries.

Submissions

To submit your research to SSRN, sign in to the SSRN User HeadQuarters, click the My Papers link on left menu and then the Start New Submission button at top of page.

Distribution Services

If your organization is interested in increasing readership for its research by starting a Research Paper Series, or sponsoring a Subject Matter eJournal, please email: RPS@SSRN.com

Distributed by

Social Insurance Research Network (SIRN), a division of Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP) and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

Directors

SIRN SUBJECT MATTER EJOURNALS

LARRY ATKINS
National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI)
Email: latkins@nasi.org

Please contact us at the above addresses with your comments, questions or suggestions for SIRN-Sub.

Advisory Board

Social Security, Pensions & Retirement Income eJournal

HENRY J. AARON
Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution - Economic Studies Program

KENNETH S. APFEL
Director, Management, Finance and Leadership Program - University of Maryland

MERTON C. BERNSTEIN
Walter Coles Professor of Law Emeritus, Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

BING YUNG-PING CHEN
Frank J. Manning Eminent Scholar's Chair in Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston - Gerontology Institute

ERIC R. KINGSON
Professor of Social Work and Public Administration, Syracuse University - School of Social Work

OLIVIA S. MITCHELL
Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy, Professor of Insurance and Risk Management, Executive Director, Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

ALICIA MUNNELL
Peter F. Drucker Professor in Management Sciences, Boston College - Center for Retirement Research

JOHN L. PALMER
University Professor, Syracuse University - Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs

STANFORD G. ROSS
Attorney and Consultant, Arnold & Porter, Chair, Social Security Advisory Board

C. EUGENE STEUERLE
Senior Fellow, Urban Institute

LAWRENCE H. THOMPSON
Senior Fellow, Urban Institute

JACK VANDERHEI
Research Director, Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI)

JOHN B. WILLIAMSON
Professor of Sociology, Boston College - Department of Sociology