Table of Contents

An Examination of Work-Life Balance Perspectives of Accountants

Katherine T. Smith, Texas A&M University - Mays Business School, Department of Marketing
Murphy Smith, Texas A&M University - Department of Accounting - Mays Business School
Tracy Rebecca Smith, Texas A&M University - Department of Psychology

Observations on the Changing Language of Accounting

Lisa Evans, University of Stirling - Department of Accounting and Finance

An Exploration of the Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Advanced Costing Techniques: A Comparative Analysis of Two Surveys (1996-2005)

Lino Cinquini, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Paolo Collini, Università degli Studi di Trento - Faculty of Economics
Alessandro Marelli, University of Teramo
Andrea Tenucci, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

A Game Theory Approach to Research on Lobbying Activities in Accounting Regulation: Benefits and Issues

Rachel F. Baskerville, University of Exeter, Victoria University of Wellington - School of Accounting and Commercial Law


BEHAVIORAL & EXPERIMENTAL ACCOUNTING ABSTRACTS

"An Examination of Work-Life Balance Perspectives of Accountants" Free Download

KATHERINE T. SMITH, Texas A&M University - Mays Business School, Department of Marketing
Email:
MURPHY SMITH, Texas A&M University - Department of Accounting - Mays Business School
Email:
TRACY REBECCA SMITH, Texas A&M University - Department of Psychology
Email:

Finding the balance between career and personal life has always been a challenge for working people. Work-life balance refers to people spending sufficient time at their jobs while also spending adequate time on other pursuits, such as family, hobbies, and community involvement. This study addresses two research questions. The first examines the importance people place on work-life balance. The second considers whether gender differences are associated with work-life balance. To address these questions, an examination is made of the perspectives of future accountants. Maslow's hierarchy theory and McClelland's motivational needs theory provide theoretical support for understanding people's motivation to achieve a healthy work-life balance. Gender theory and related research provide theoretical support why differences exist between male and female accountants' perspectives. The study also reviews what current accounting professionals are doing to improve their work-life balance.

"Observations on the Changing Language of Accounting" Free Download

LISA EVANS, University of Stirling - Department of Accounting and Finance
Email:

The meaning of words, including those of technical languages such as accounting, can change over time. In addition, new words may enter a language, sometimes replacing other words. The paper argues that changes in terminology, changes in meaning, and the timing of changes, but in particular the reasons for changes must be of interest to historians, because a close examination can prevent misinterpretation of historical source material, and also provide useful insights into shifting socio-economic, political or ideological process and power relationships. Drawing on prior literature and on primary sources as well as linguistics literature with a focus on special registers of language, the paper provides examples to illustrate a number of potential causal factors for change, and discusses their implications. It also explores implications of specific features of the accounting register for academic discourse.

"An Exploration of the Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Advanced Costing Techniques: A Comparative Analysis of Two Surveys (1996-2005)" Free Download

LINO CINQUINI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Email:
PAOLO COLLINI, Università degli Studi di Trento - Faculty of Economics
Email:
ALESSANDRO MARELLI, University of Teramo
Email:
ANDREA TENUCCI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Email:

The issue of cost calculation has been largely debated in the last years under the pressure of the perceived lost of relevance of the so called traditional cost accounting approaches. The enthusiasm for new management accounting techniques has often driven most of attention towards technical or theoretical aspects of the proposed new cost models. In particular, Activity-Based Costing (ABC) implementation literature pinpoints a large number of studies that have looked at technical and organizational/behavioral factors that influence effective implementation.

Recently a great attention has been paid by researchers on the contingent factors affecting the adoption of advanced management accounting techniques and the influence of the variables that drive towards higher levels of cost system sophistication. The need is felt for insightful studies regarding processes and contingent variables working through time in relation with these changes. Improved analysis can be obtained by undertaking replication studies based on larger number of responses and/or across geographic and cultural borders. Whitin the boundaries of a contingent framework analysis, this paper has provided additional insights into areas relating to factors influencing the level of sophistication of product cost systems in Italy.

The paper presents the comparison of two survey results carried on in a ten years distance on the same sample of Italian largest companies. These two long-distance surveys provide the opportunity to assess the changes occurred in the companies that in 1996 declared the adoption of (or the interest in adopting) ABC and Target costing (Cinquini et al., 1999). Moreover, the time elapsed could allow the perception about adopters' behavior, along different stages of the diffusion process of advanced costing techniques. The research findings pinpoint that only importance of cost information and cost structure, among the contextual variables considered in the more recent survey responses, are positive and significant in relation with increasing in implementation of advanced costing techniques. This outcome could open to further studies to assess whether or not adopters are moving from a fad and fashion behavior of the early stages, to a more rational approach in which the matching between management needs and tools potentiality is maximized.

"A Game Theory Approach to Research on Lobbying Activities in Accounting Regulation: Benefits and Issues" Free Download
Victoria University Centre for Accounting, Governance and Taxation Research Working Paper No. 42

RACHEL F. BASKERVILLE, University of Exeter, Victoria University of Wellington - School of Accounting and Commercial Law
Email:

There is a lack of consensus on the most appropriate methodological framework for studies of regulation and due process in order to provide robust outcomes and predictive potential. In addition to this diversity of approaches, research typically adopts a "single-event focus" to an examination of due process and regulatory efficiency. The objective of this research is to examine the advantages and issues arising when methodologies offering a multi-event approach are adopted specifically the utility of game theory methodology in accounting lobbying research.

The applications of game theory in previous studies in accounting research are summarised (the application to FASB voting rules, auditor-client interaction, and accounting disclosure choices relevant to wage bargaining) and the theoretical basis for studies of lobbying behaviour is also reviewed. The standard model as currently utilised in research on lobbying activities is described, and an alternative dynamic model proposed. Four core issues arise in the application of such a dynamic model: identification of the master game and sub-games, gradual or punctuated equilibrium, agency issues, and reputation effects.

It is apparent from the application of game theory in other areas of accounting research that evolutionary game theory offers a more comprehensive and dynamic model of real-world events, based on multi-period or sequential events. The proposed utility of a game theoretic model in accounting research on due process and regulation justifies further developments in this area.

^top

Solicitation of Abstracts

Behavioral & Experimental Accounting publishes working and accepted paper abstracts covering all aspects of behavioral and experimental accounting. Its mission is to foster an understanding of those elements of human behavior, both cognitive and affective (emotional) that influence the decision-making process in all accounting contexts and settings. It aims to distribute cutting edge research that integrates the methods used in the behavioral sciences with the ones traditional to Accounting, so that decision makers and their choices can be investigated from individual, group, organizational, and market perspectives.

This perspective of accounting is particularly salient in view of the financial collapse of numerous firms and the flawed decision-making by investors, company officers, and accounting experts (particularly the failure of CPAs and auditors to enforce accounting standards). The journal hopes to foster better decision-making and bridge the gap with other disciplines by investigating how various cognitive processes and emotional factors may hinder or contribute to optimal decision making in accounting and related fields with an interdisciplinary perspective: including: behavioral finance, financial psychology, economic psychology, behavioral economics, psychological economics, behavioral law, organizational behavior, and behavioral marketing.

The purpose of this journal is to provide research on the behavior of accountants, including auditors, and non-accountants and how the developers, users, and auditors of accounting information are influenced by various accounting functions and reports, financial and non-financial information, and mental processes when presenting and interpreting information. The journal welcomes current research that focuses on human information processing behavior, judgment quality, accounting problems, and decision making skills of users and producers of accounting information. The journal also welcomes working papers and accepted paper abstracts based on strong accounting behavioral research methodology, replication studies, case studies, empirical works, book reviews, literature reviews, and survey articles.

The scope of Behavioral and Experimental Accounting incorporates an extensive body of knowledge and research that utilizes qualitative, quantitative, and multi-method research methodologies from other business fields, social sciences, behavioral sciences, and decision sciences that are not characteristically applied within standard or conventional accounting. This consists of accounting studies that apply experimental research approaches and laboratory experiments that offer an alternative, nontraditional or controversial perspective of various accounting topics. The scope of this journal also extends to the utilization of standard research approaches and quantitative methodologies of accounting to uncommon issues of accounting that are not regularly investigated or studied by accounting traditionalists.

Consequently, behavioral and experimental accounting research can encompass a broad range of topics or subdisciplines such as investments, judgment and decision making, risk-taking behavior and analysis, financial management, managerial accounting and control, budgeting, auditing, debate over market efficiency, accounting information processing and systems, strategic planning, educational research, tax accounting, financial reporting, financial statement analysis, accounting organizations and society, accounting technology, governmental and nonprofit accounting, mutual fund accounting, institutional accounting, international accounting, securities regulation, and disclosure law.

To submit your research to SSRN, log in to the SSRN User HeadQuarters, and click on the My Papers link on the left menu, and then click on Start New Submission at the top of the page.

Distribution Services

If your Institution is interested in learning more about increasing readership for its research by becoming a Partner in Publishing or starting a Research Paper Series, please email: Management@SSRN.com.

Distributed by:

Accounting Research Network (ARN), a division of Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP) and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

Directors

ARN SUBJECT MATTER EJOURNALS

ROSS L. WATTS
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
Email: rwatts@mit.edu

Please contact us at the above addresses with your comments, questions or suggestions for ARN-Sub.

Advisory Board

Behavioral & Experimental Accounting

ROBERT H. ASHTON
L. Palmer Fox Professor of Business, Duke University

ROBERT J. BLOOMFIELD
Professor of Accounting, Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management

SARAH E. BONNER
BDO Seidman, LLP Faculty Fellow and Professor of Management, University of Southern California

PENNY CIANCANELLI
Senior Lecturer, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow - Department of Accounting and Finance

LAWRENCE A. CUNNINGHAM
Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School

SONJA GALLHOFER
Professor, University of Aberdeen - Business School

AUDREY A. GRAMLING
Associate Professor of Accounting, Kennesaw State University - Michael J. Coles College of Business

D. ERIC HIRST
Professor of Accounting and Ernst & Young Faculty Fellow, University of Texas at Austin

VICKY B. HOFFMAN
Associate Professor of Business Administration, University of Pittsburgh - Katz Graduate School of Business

PATRICK E. HOPKINS
Associate Professor of Accounting & BKD LLP Faculty Fellow, Indiana University

JAMES E. HUNTON
Board of Trustees Professor, Bentley College - Department of Accountancy, Research Professor, University of Maastricht

STEVEN J. KACHELMEIER
Charles T. Zlatkovich Centennial Professor, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Accounting

KATHRYN KADOUS
Associate Professor, Emory University - Goizueta Business School

S. JANE KENNEDY
Associate Professor, University of Washington - Department of Accounting

ROBERT LIBBY
David A. Thomas Professor of Management, Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management

THOMAS J. LINSMEIER
Member of the Board, Financial Accounting Standards Board

MARLYS GASCHO LIPE
Rath Chair in Accounting, University of Oklahoma - Michael F. Price College of Business

JOAN L. LUFT
Professor, Michigan State University - Department of Accounting & Information Systems

LAUREEN A. MAINES
Associate Professor, Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Accounting, Faculty Fellow, PricewaterhouseCoopers

BRIAN W. MAYHEW
Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Accounting and Information Systems

EDWARD J. MCCAFFERY
Robert C. Packard Trustee Chair in Law and Political Science, USC Gould School of Law

STEVEN E. SALTERIO
Professor of Business (Accounting and Control), Queen's University - School of Business

SANDRA C. VERA-MUNOZ
Associate Professor and KPMG Faculty Fellow, University of Notre Dame - Department of Accountancy

STACEY WHITECOTTON
Associate Professor, Arizona State University - School of Accountancy & Information Management