The Paradox of Professionalism: Global Law Practice Means Business

32 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2009

See all articles by Christopher J. Whelan

Christopher J. Whelan

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; Washington and Lee - School of Law

Date Written: January 28, 2009

Abstract

This article outlines the contrasting 'professional' and 'business' visions of legal practice and the lawyer's role in society. It sets out the regulatory 'maze' that had developed in the UK prior to 2007, reflecting the unresolved business/profession dichotomy. In 2007, radical and revolutionary reforms were introduced in the Legal Services Act. The reforms appear to signal an end to professionalism, the final intrusion of the marketplace into legal services, and the victory of the business vision of legal practice. However, I argue that a closer analysis suggests that a new vision of legal practice has been created specifically - and paradoxically - with global law practice in mind. Law should be both a business and a profession because professionalism is good for business! Global law practice has been reconstituted as a hybrid: business and profession.

Keywords: global law, commercialism, professionalism, legal services

Suggested Citation

Whelan, Christopher J., The Paradox of Professionalism: Global Law Practice Means Business (January 28, 2009). Penn State International Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2009, Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-01, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3/2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1334119

Christopher J. Whelan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

1 Wellington Square
Oxford, OX1 2JA
United Kingdom
+44 1993 813877 (Phone)

Washington and Lee - School of Law ( email )

Lexington, VA 24450
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
441
Abstract Views
1,952
Rank
163,416
PlumX Metrics