Considering Democracy and ADR: Diversity Based Practice in Public Collaborative Processes

Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues, Vol. 19, p. 13, March 2005

32 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2011

See all articles by Gemma E. Smyth

Gemma E. Smyth

University of Windsor Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2005

Abstract

This article critically examines emerging public participatory processes and rhetoric about their ability to increase participatory democracy. The author questions the assumption that participatory democracy is an adequate goal for North American democratic decision-making processes; rather, both government and ADR practitioners should consider the potential of diversity-based democratic theory to inform participatory processes. The author draws from several emerging democratic and ADR theories to form a series of recommendations to incorporate diversity-based practice, thus improving the quality of democratic participation.

Keywords: ADR, participatory democracy, dispute resolution, public participatory processes

Suggested Citation

Smyth, Gemma E., Considering Democracy and ADR: Diversity Based Practice in Public Collaborative Processes (March 1, 2005). Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues, Vol. 19, p. 13, March 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1632677

Gemma E. Smyth (Contact Author)

University of Windsor Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4
Canada
5192533000 x. 2967 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
601
Rank
783,685
PlumX Metrics