Stopping Suicide Attacks: Optimal Strategies and Unintended Consequences

40 Pages Posted: 27 Dec 2010 Last revised: 18 Jun 2023

See all articles by Michael T. McBride

Michael T. McBride

University of California, Irvine - Department of Economics

Gary Richardson

University of California at Irvine; National Bureau of Economic Research

Date Written: December 2010

Abstract

Governments fighting terrorists have many tactical options, yet these options often yield unintended and counterproductive consequences. This paper models a terrorist organization, a religious group from which the terrorists recruit suicide bombers, and the society in which the terrorists are embedded. The model illuminates how the choice of anti-insurgent tactics influences the incidence of attacks, paying particular attention to the direct and indirect (unintended) consequences of the government's actions. The ultimate goal of this work is to identify the best way to stop terrorist attacks

Suggested Citation

McBride, Michael T. and Richardson, Gary, Stopping Suicide Attacks: Optimal Strategies and Unintended Consequences (December 2010). NBER Working Paper No. w16637, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1730584

Michael T. McBride (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine - Department of Economics ( email )

3151 Social Science Plaza
Irvine, CA 92697-5100
United States

Gary Richardson

University of California at Irvine ( email )

3151 Social Science Plaza
Irvine, CA 92697-5100
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~garyr/welcome.html

National Bureau of Economic Research ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.nber.org

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
706
PlumX Metrics