Religious Commitment and Identity: Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem

Abstract

In the recent case of Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, the Supreme Court of Canada held that a condominium association’s refusal to permit Orthodox Jewish unit-owners (the appellants) to construct succahs on their balconies, as part of the Jewish festival of Succot, breached their freedom of religion under the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. Because the restriction of religious practice was imposed by a non-state actor, the Canadian Charter of Rights was not applicable. However, the majority judgment of Iaccobucci J. was clear that “the principles … applicable in cases where an individual alleges that his or her freedom of religion is infringed under the Quebec Charter” are also applicable to a claim under section 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Keywords: Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, Supreme Court of Canada, Succot, Succahs, Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, s. 2(a), Charter of Rights and Freedoms