Public Goals by Private Means, & Public Actors Protecting Private Interests: A Response to Professor Jones

Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 371-381, 2013

11 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2013 Last revised: 5 May 2024

See all articles by Jasminka Kalajdzic

Jasminka Kalajdzic

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law

Date Written: December 1, 2012

Abstract

In his thoughtful paper on the relative advantages and deficiencies of private and public enforcement mechanisms for improving consumer protection, Craig Jones forces us to ask a fundamental question about our choice of legal tools: under what circumstances, if ever, should reliance be placed on public regulatory bodies, and when should the protection of the public be left to private litigation, principally through class actions?

In this paper, I join Prof. Jones in his view that both our current regulatory model and class action regime are deficient in relation to consumer protection. I have a different diagnosis, however, of the class action problem and its possible remedy. In addition, I argue that greater emphasis ought to be placed on reforming the regulatory model, and look to other jurisdictions as potential models for consideration.

Keywords: class actions, private enforcement, regulatory agencies, consumer protection

JEL Classification: K10, K23, K40

Suggested Citation

Kalajdzic, Jasminka, Public Goals by Private Means, & Public Actors Protecting Private Interests: A Response to Professor Jones (December 1, 2012). Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 371-381, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2198419

Jasminka Kalajdzic (Contact Author)

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 N9B 3P4
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Abstract Views
1,169
Rank
530,816
PlumX Metrics