Predation and its Rate of Return: The Sugar Industry, 1887-1914
43 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2000 Last revised: 26 Dec 2022
Date Written: May 1997
Abstract
We study entry into the American sugar refining industry before World War I. We show that the price wars following two major entry episodes were predatory. Our proof is twofold: by direct comparison of price to marginal cost, and by construction of predicted competitive price cost margins that we show to exceed observed margins. We argue that predation occurred only when the relative cost of it to the dominant firm was small, and that it was most probably used to deter future capacity additions. It was also used to lower the purchase price of preexisting firms after one entry episode.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Rules, Communication and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case
By David Genesove and Wallace P. Mullin
-
Rules, Communication and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case
By David Genesove and Wallace P. Mullin
-
The Sugar Institute Learns to Organize Information Exchange
By David Genesove and Wallace P. Mullin
-
Tacit Collusion with Price Matching Punishments
By Yuanzhu Lu and Julian Wright
-
Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion
By David J. Cooper and Kai-uwe Kuhn
-
Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion
By David J. Cooper and Kai-uwe Kuhn
-
Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion
By David J. Cooper and Kai-uwe Kuhn