Tests of Three Parity Conditions: Distinguishing Risk Premia and Systematic Forecast Errors

36 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2000 Last revised: 16 Dec 2022

See all articles by Richard C. Marston

Richard C. Marston

University of Pennsylvania - Finance Department; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: November 1994

Abstract

Two explanations are given for why nominal or real returns differ across currencies: foreign exchange risk premia and systematic (rational) forecast errors. This study reexamines three parity conditions in international finance, uncovered interest parity, purchasing power parity, and real interest parity, to determine the relative importance of these two factors. The study develops joint tests of the three parity conditions by relating nominal and real interest differentials and inflation differentials to the same set of variables currently known to investors. The study tests parameter restrictions based on knowing that risk premiums only affect nominal and real interest differentials, but not inflation differentials, while systematic errors in forecasting exchange rates only affect nominal interest differentials and inflation differentials, but not real interest differentials.

Suggested Citation

Marston, Richard C., Tests of Three Parity Conditions: Distinguishing Risk Premia and Systematic Forecast Errors (November 1994). NBER Working Paper No. w4923, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=238460

Richard C. Marston (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Finance Department ( email )

The Wharton School
3620 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-7626 (Phone)
215-573-2242 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States