Judicial Selection In Tennessee: Deciding 'The Decider" '

1 Belmont Law Review 143 (2014)

38 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2014

See all articles by Margaret Behm

Margaret Behm

Dodson Parker Behm & Capparella, PC

Candi Henry

Dodson Parker Behm & Capparella, PC

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

This article includes an overview of judicial selection in Tennessee, as well as providing the author's personal perspectives on the subject.

The quality of judges and the manner of selecting them matters; this is a basic premise underpinning the rule of law in the United States. From the inception of the United States’ democratic system, the judiciary’s Damoclean Sword has been the threat of subrogation at the hands of the Legislature, and perhaps the easiest way to rattle the sword has been to legislatively interfere with judicial selection — whether by changing the manner of appointment or by simply refusing to fill vacancies. The comments above span the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, and today in Tennessee the proverbial horse’s hair has never seemed more precarious.

Keywords: Tennessee Judicial Selection, Tennessee Judiciary

Suggested Citation

Behm, Margaret and Henry, Candi, Judicial Selection In Tennessee: Deciding 'The Decider" ' (2014). 1 Belmont Law Review 143 (2014) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480621

Margaret Behm (Contact Author)

Dodson Parker Behm & Capparella, PC ( email )

1310 Sixth Avenue North
Nashville, TN
United States

Candi Henry

Dodson Parker Behm & Capparella, PC ( email )

1310 Sixth Avenue North
Nashville, TN
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
62
Abstract Views
870
Rank
951,658
PlumX Metrics