Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints

21 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2015 Last revised: 13 Oct 2015

See all articles by Jeff Berryman

Jeff Berryman

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law

Robyn Carroll

University of Western Australia

Date Written: September 1, 2014

Abstract

This article draws on an emerging body of empirical research that indicates that parties place a greater emphasis in some situations on actual rather than substitutionary performance. It examines the case law on the enforcement of keep open clauses in Canada, Australia and other common law jurisdictions to highlight the disconnect between doctrinal orthodoxy on the enforceability of such clauses and party remedial preferences. The article explores the constraints of supervision and enforcement and concludes there is scope for enhancing party preference for performance through coercive remedies.

Keywords: specific performance, remedies, contract, enforcement

Suggested Citation

Berryman, Jeffrey and Carroll, Robyn, Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints (September 1, 2014). University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol. 38, 2014, UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2667236

Jeffrey Berryman (Contact Author)

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 N9B 3P4
Canada

Robyn Carroll

University of Western Australia ( email )

M253
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, Western Australia 6009
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Abstract Views
1,267
Rank
635,507
PlumX Metrics