The Case for ‘Firewall’ Protections for Irregular Migrants: Safeguarding Fundamental Rights

2-3, European Journal of Migration and Law (EMIL), 157-183

27 Pages Posted: 17 May 2016 Last revised: 20 May 2016

See all articles by François Crépeau

François Crépeau

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Bethany Hastie

Peter A. Allard School of Law, the University of British Columbia

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

The issue of irregular migration is experiencing heightened attention in political, social and legal arenas. While deterrence and crime-control discourse and practices dominate current approaches to irregular migration, this article seeks to focus on the problematic neglect of the treatment of irregular migrants in destination countries, in relation to their ability to access fundamental rights and basic public services. This article will put forth an argument for the establishment of firewalls – a separation between immigration enforcement activities and public service provision. This article will canvass existing trends and practices that have both contributed to the erosion of firewall protections, and have built and maintained meaningful firewalls between immigration and public service provision.

Keywords: immigration enforcement, Irregular migration, firewalls, fundamental rights

Suggested Citation

Crépeau, François and Hastie, Bethany, The Case for ‘Firewall’ Protections for Irregular Migrants: Safeguarding Fundamental Rights (2015). 2-3, European Journal of Migration and Law (EMIL), 157-183, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780641

François Crépeau (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

Bethany Hastie

Peter A. Allard School of Law, the University of British Columbia ( email )

1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
720
Abstract Views
3,746
Rank
89,370
PlumX Metrics