'Bridging the Clinical-Doctrinal Divide: Clinician and Student Views of Teaching and Learning in Clinical Legal Programs'
Integrating Curricular and Co-Curricular Endeavors to Enhance Student Outcomes (Emerald Group Publishing: UK, 2016), pp. 119-141.
Posted: 10 Jun 2016
Date Written: May 20, 2016
Abstract
The initial purpose of this study was to examine the educational needs and perceptions of students and clinicians in Canadian legal clinics. The author conducted a literature review of leading legal educational materials in Canada and the United Status focusing on required or preferred competencies for law students. The author then interviewed law students, clinicians, social workers, and community legal workers, all of whom were working or studying at law school-affiliated legal clinics. Interview subjects were asked a series of questions about their learning experiences in hopes of informing the creation of teaching and learning materials. The data revealed an under-reliance on the affective elements of teaching, learning and practice in both existing literature and current teaching practices. The data also revealed deep structural divides between doctrinal and clinical teaching and learning approaches. Without further integration, students and, ultimately, communities and clients will not reap the benefits of an integrated curriculum.
Keywords: clinical legal education, clinical/ doctrinal, law school curriculum, supervision in the clinical setting, curriculum integration
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation