A Theory of the Tax Avoidance (Tax Planning) Continuum

28 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2016 Last revised: 21 Aug 2020

See all articles by Mark Penno

Mark Penno

University of Iowa - Department of Accounting

Date Written: August 21, 2020

Abstract


There is no precise definition to date of either tax aggressiveness or tax risk (Blouin, 2014). Accordingly, I model tax avoidance (tax planning) activity as corresponding to a gray-area continuum with endpoints representing transactions with certain tax treatments. As a modeling innovation – in contrast to tax evasion models which focus on the underreporting of ex post cash flow realizations – I assume that the taxpayer ex ante structures (plans) a transaction, and the tax authority does not contest the tax savings requested by the taxpayer, but must choose instead whether to expend resources challenging whether the transaction qualifies for favorable treatment under a vague tax law. The results enable me to distinguish between tax aggressiveness and tax risk – thereby providing an explanation for the undersheltering puzzle. The results also explain how a more aggressive tax authority may surprisingly lead to more aggressive taxpayers, and when FIN 48 liabilities are not meaningful.

Keywords: Tax aggressiveness, Undersheltering puzzle; FIN 48

JEL Classification: H26

Suggested Citation

Penno, Mark C., A Theory of the Tax Avoidance (Tax Planning) Continuum (August 21, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876746 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2876746

Mark C. Penno (Contact Author)

University of Iowa - Department of Accounting ( email )

21 E Market St, Iowa City, IA 52242
Iowa City, IA 52242-1000
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
332
Abstract Views
1,654
Rank
102,821
PlumX Metrics