The Third Criterion: Compactness as a Procedural Safeguard Against Partisan Gerrymandering

54 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2017

See all articles by Daniel D. Polsby

Daniel D. Polsby

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Robert Popper

New York State Bar Association (NYSBA)

Date Written: March 18, 1991

Abstract

This paper addresses partisan gerrymandering and proposes a formal remedy. In addition to adhering to criteria which mandate that representational districts be composed of contiguous territories and have equal populations, we suggest that those who define district boundaries must also be required to respect a third criterion, the constraint of compactness.

Keywords: bounderies, gerrymandering, voting, elections, election law

JEL Classification: K19

Suggested Citation

Polsby, Daniel D. and Popper, Robert, The Third Criterion: Compactness as a Procedural Safeguard Against Partisan Gerrymandering (March 18, 1991). Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1991, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2936284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2936284

Daniel D. Polsby (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

United States

Robert Popper

New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) ( email )

One Elk Street
Albany, NY 12207
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
312
Abstract Views
1,854
Rank
251,365
PlumX Metrics