Governments’ Enforcement of Corporate Bribery Laws: A Call for a Two-Track Regulatory Regime

23 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2018 Last revised: 11 Jun 2019

See all articles by Jon Petter Rui

Jon Petter Rui

University of Bergen

Tina Søreide

NHH Norwegian School of Economics - Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law

Date Written: February 26, 2018

Abstract

Internationally, there is a trend toward a regulatory regime for corporate bribery with more emphasis on ex ante oversight and preventive systems, and less emphasis on investigations driven by suspected crime. Governments want the benefits associated with civil law regulation – including corporate self-regulation and the flexibility associated with negotiated settlements, although such tools compromise criminal justice values. In this article, we explain why governments need to establish a two-track regulatory regime consisting of a forward-looking administrative/civil law system with a focus on crime prevention and a backward-looking criminal law process for investigation of crime incidents. A clearer institutional distinction between intrinsically different regulatory tasks will secure a more efficient regulation of corporate bribery and other forms of corporate misconduct.

Keywords: corruption, corporate criminal liability, enforcement, regulation bribery

Suggested Citation

Rui, Jon Petter and Soreide, Tina, Governments’ Enforcement of Corporate Bribery Laws: A Call for a Two-Track Regulatory Regime (February 26, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3130389 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3130389

Jon Petter Rui

University of Bergen ( email )

Muséplassen 1
N-5008 Bergen, +47 55 58
Norway

Tina Soreide (Contact Author)

NHH Norwegian School of Economics - Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law ( email )

Helleveien 30
N-5045 Bergen
Norway

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
1,053
Rank
576,708
PlumX Metrics