Banking on the Boom, Tripped by the Bust: Banks and the World War I Agricultural Price Shock

59 Pages Posted: 16 Oct 2018 Last revised: 30 Mar 2026

See all articles by Matthew Jaremski

Matthew Jaremski

Utah State University - Huntsman School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

David C. Wheelock

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis - Research Division

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 2018

Abstract

How do banks respond to asset booms? This paper examines i) how U.S. banks responded to the World War I farmland boom; ii) the impact of regulation; and iii) how bank closures exacerbated the post-war bust. The boom encouraged new bank formation and balance sheet expansion (especially by new banks). Deposit insurance amplified the impact of rising crop prices on bank portfolios, while higher minimum capital requirements dampened the effects. Banks that responded most aggressively to the asset boom had a higher probability of closing in the bust, and counties with more bank closures experienced larger declines in land prices.

Suggested Citation

Jaremski, Matthew and Wheelock, David C., Banking on the Boom, Tripped by the Bust: Banks and the World War I Agricultural Price Shock (October 2018). NBER Working Paper No. w25159, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266275

Matthew Jaremski (Contact Author)

Utah State University - Huntsman School of Business ( email )

3500 Old Main Hill
Logan, UT 84322-3500
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

David C. Wheelock

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis - Research Division ( email )

P.O. Box 442
St. Louis, MO 63166-0442
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
568
PlumX Metrics