puc-header

Future State Prediction Errors Guide Active Avoidance Behavior by Adult Zebrafish

52 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2019 Last revised: 4 Mar 2019 Publication Status: Review Complete

See all articles by Makio Torigoe

Makio Torigoe

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Tanvir Islam

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making; RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center

Hisaya Kakinuma

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making; RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center

Chi Chung Alan Fung

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Coding and Brain Computing

Takuya Isomura

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation

Hideaki Shimazaki

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation

Tazu Aoki

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Tomoki Fukai

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Coding and Brain Computing

Hitoshi Okamoto

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making; RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center

More...

Abstract

Human predicts future. To ask if fish also has this capacity, we established the virtual reality training system with live imaging of the telencephalic neurons of adult zebrafish in the active avoidance and found that, at the onset of the trial, learned fish conceives two future conditions as the favorable status on its way to the safe goal, i.e. one with the backwardly moving landscape and the other with the color of the safe goal. And the two different neural ensembles monitor the discrepancy between these predictions and the perceived real external status. Once fish reaches the goal, another ensemble is set to work to monitor whether fish keeps staying in the safe goal. The manipulation to artificially enhance these prediction errors elevated the activities of these ensembles and induced fish to behave to correct errors, revealing that fish sets behavioral strategy to actively realize these predictions.

Suggested Citation

Torigoe, Makio and Islam, Tanvir and Kakinuma, Hisaya and Fung, Chi Chung Alan and Isomura, Takuya and Shimazaki, Hideaki and Aoki, Tazu and Fukai, Tomoki and Okamoto, Hitoshi, Future State Prediction Errors Guide Active Avoidance Behavior by Adult Zebrafish. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3345551 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3345551
This version of the paper has not been formally peer reviewed.

Makio Torigoe

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Saitama
Japan

Tanvir Islam

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Saitama
Japan

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center

Saitama
Japan

Hisaya Kakinuma

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Saitama
Japan

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center

Saitama
Japan

Chi Chung Alan Fung

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Coding and Brain Computing

Saitama
Japan

Takuya Isomura

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation

Saitama
Japan

Hideaki Shimazaki

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation

Saitama
Japan

Tazu Aoki

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making

Saitama
Japan

Tomoki Fukai

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Coding and Brain Computing

Saitama
Japan

Hitoshi Okamoto (Contact Author)

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Laboratory for Neural Circuit Dynamics of Decision Making ( email )

Saitama
Japan

RIKEN Center for Brain Science - Kao Collaboration Center ( email )

Saitama
Japan