header

Enhanced Recovery Protocol Improves Postoperative Outcomes and Minimizes Narcotic Use Following Resection for Colon and Rectal Cancer

19 Pages Posted: 14 May 2019 Publication Status: Review Complete

See all articles by Ian M. Paquette

Ian M. Paquette

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Alexander R. Cortez

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Al-Faraaz Kassam

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Nick C. Levinsky

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Andrew Jung

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Meghan C. Daly

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Shimul A. Shah

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Janice F. Rafferty

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) are associated with improved recovery. However, data on outcomes following the ERP implementation in colorectal cancer (CRC) are limited. We set out to study the postoperative outcomes, opioid use patterns, and cost impact for patients undergoing colon or rectal resection for cancer.

Methods: A retrospective review of all elective CRC resections from January 2015 to June 2018 at a single institution was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Colon and rectal patients were studied separately, with comparison of pre-ERP to post-ERP patients.

Results: 192 patients underwent elective colorectal resection for cancer. In January 2016, an ERP was implemented for all elective resections – 71 patients underwent surgery in the pre-ERP period (33 colon and 38 rectal) and 121 (56 colon and 65 rectal) occurred in the post-ERP period.There were differences with regard to age, gender, or BMI before or after the implementation of ERP for both groups (all p > 0.05). For both colon and rectal cancer patients, ERP reduced time to regular diet (both p < 0.05) and length of stay (colon: 3 vs. 4 days; rectal: 4 vs. 6 days; both p< 0.01). ERP patients also consumed fewer total narcotics (colon: 44 vs. 184 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), p < 0.01; rectal: 121 vs. 393 MME, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: ERP use reduced length of stay and narcotic use with similar total costs and no difference in 30-day complications for both colon and rectal cancer resections.

Keywords: colorectal surgery, colorectal cancer, enhanced recovery protocol, outcomes, resource utilization, narcotics

Suggested Citation

Paquette, Ian M. and Cortez, Alexander R. and Kassam, Al-Faraaz and Levinsky, Nick C. and Jung, Andrew and Daly, Meghan C. and Shah, Shimul A. and Rafferty, Janice F., Enhanced Recovery Protocol Improves Postoperative Outcomes and Minimizes Narcotic Use Following Resection for Colon and Rectal Cancer (May 11, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3386398 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3386398

Ian M. Paquette (Contact Author)

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS) ( email )

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Alexander R. Cortez

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Al-Faraaz Kassam

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Nick C. Levinsky

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Andrew Jung

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS) ( email )

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Meghan C. Daly

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Shimul A. Shah

University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Janice F. Rafferty

University of Cincinnati, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS)

Cincinnati, OH
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
242
Abstract Views
1,104
PlumX Metrics