How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention
D. Walton and T. F. Gordon, Argumentation, 33(2), 2019, 269-295.
25 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2019
There are 2 versions of this paper
How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention
How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic With Argument Invention
Date Written: May 30, 2017
Abstract
This paper compares the features and methods of the two leading implemented systems that offer a tool for helping a user to find or invent arguments to support or attack a designated conclusion, the Carneades Argumentation System and the IBM Watson Debater tool. The central aim is to contribute to the understanding of scholars in informal logic, rhetoric and argumentation on how these two software systems can be useful for them. One contribution of the paper is to explain to these potential users how the two tools are applicable to the task of inventing arguments by using some simple illustrative examples. Another is to redefine the structure of argument invention as a procedure.
Keywords: rhetorical invention, artificial intelligence, argument mining, computational linguistics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation