Fintech and Network Economics in Real Estate: REWs and MLS As Policy Transmission Mechanisms, ‘Portfolio Screens’ and ‘Portfolio Frames’

17 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2019

Date Written: Revised 2018 ,

Abstract

Multiple Listing Systems (MLS), Real Estate Website (REW) Laws, and Rent-Control and Rent-Stabilization statutes (RCRS) are un-constitutional and could have affected the transmission of monetary policy and fiscal policies, and the rapid changes in housing prices and housing demand which occurred in the US and other countries between 1995 and 2010. MLS and REWs are fintech systems that are used around the world. There is an increasing and symbiotic relationship between the un-constitutionality and anti-competition effects of MLS, Real Estate Websites (REWs) and RCRS on one hand, and systemic risk and financial stability. MLS, Real Estate Websites (REWs) and RCRS can have substantial effects on consumer behavior in credit and asset markets – and this can precipitate structural changes in the financial services, real estate and retailing industries. Hence, all existing housing-demand models and housing price forecast models are grossly mis-specified primarily because they don’t incorporate legal factors and associated economic effects.

Suggested Citation

Nwogugu, Michael C. I., Fintech and Network Economics in Real Estate: REWs and MLS As Policy Transmission Mechanisms, ‘Portfolio Screens’ and ‘Portfolio Frames’ (Revised 2018 ,). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3410637 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410637

Michael C. I. Nwogugu (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

P. O. Box 11104
Enugu 400007, Enugu State 400007
Nigeria
2348149062100 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
977
Rank
584,619
PlumX Metrics